Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mayar Sherif vs Tamara Zidansek Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sherif vs Zidansek analysis and find out who is favored!
Mayar Sherif vs Tamara Zidansek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sherif 1 - 0 Zidansek
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sherif has won 47.7% of points on their second serve, while Zidansek has won 42.78%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sherif, in recent form, has won 53.95% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zidansek has won 53.24%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.14% and 37.38% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sherif has saved 53.16% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zidansek has saved 54.3% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sherif has won 59.26% of matches played (W/L 32/ 22), with Zidansek winning 55.56% (W/L 30/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sherif has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 74% (W/L 183/ 64), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3). Zidansek has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 73% (W/L 230/ 83), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 39% (W/L 7/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Sherif has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 82.61% of matches (W/L 19/ 4), where as Zidansek has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 20/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sherif winning 1 times and Zidansek being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sherif winning 2 and Zidansek winning 0. The last match between Sherif and Zidansek was at the Makarska Open 125 - Makarska, 06-06-2023, First, Clay with Mayar Sherif getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sherif and Zidansek have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sherif winning 0 times and Zidansek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sherif winning 0, and Zidansek 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sherif has played against opponents with an average rank of 146.33 while Zidansek has played against players with an average rank of 207.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sherif has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zidansek has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sherif has converted 49.07% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zidansek has converted 41.9% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
53
Rank
31
High
28
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
131
Rank
22
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
65% (257-137)
Career Total W/L
65% (337-183)
58% (15-11)
YTD W/L
42% (8-11)
$983,588
Career Prize Money
$1,804,181
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mayar Sherif | Tamara Zidansek |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:30 | 1:21:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (41/56) | 57% (27/47) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (30/41) | 59% (16/27) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (6/15) | 45% (9/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 17% (1/6) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (22/47) | 36% (20/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Mayar Sherif
Player
Tamara Zidansek
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mayar Sherif | Tamara Zidansek |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (15/11) | 42% (8/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (34/26) | 43% (20/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (289/261) | 47% (201/227) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 65% (15/8) | 58% (7/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0.07 |
| Aces Total | 26 | 15 |
| DFs per game | 0.11 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 29 | 65 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:43 | 1:57:46 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 139.15 | 179.37 |
| 1st Serve % | 75% (1339/1796) | 61% (868/1422) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (799/1339) | 61% (531/868) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (218/457) | 43% (237/554) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (106/216) | 42% (75/179) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (820/1816) | 43% (621/1439) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 67% (4/2) |
| Masters W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 78% (7/2) | 44% (4/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (15/26) | 42% (8/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (14/14) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (14/0) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 17% (12/2) |
Mayar Sherif Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Keys
Player
Mayar Sherif
84%
(
47 of
56)
1st Serve %
81%
(
51 of
63)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-0 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Yue Yuan
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Mayar Sherif
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
74%
(
31 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
11 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Aya El Aouni
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
90%
(
45 of
50)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Anna Schmiedlova
Player
Mayar Sherif
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
80%
(
90 of
112)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
47 of
90)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
112)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Renata Zarazua
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve %
77%
(
44 of
57)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mayar Sherif
Player
Susan Bandecchi
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Tamara Zidansek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Tamara Zidansek
48%
(
30 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
87)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Hailey Baptiste
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
48%
(
41 of
86)
1
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Noma Akugue Noha
61%
(
57 of
93)
1st Serve %
79%
(
75 of
95)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
49%
(
46 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
51 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Polona Hercog
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julie Struplova
Player
Tamara Zidansek
76%
(
94 of
123)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
55%
(
52 of
94)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56%
(
10 of
18)
Break Points Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
61 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
57 of
106)
119
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Sinja Kraus
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Cristina Dinu
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nastasja Mariana Schunk
Player
Tamara Zidansek
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
91)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hailey Baptiste
Player
Tamara Zidansek
50%
(
54 of
108)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
5
Aces
0
13
Double Faults
7
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
42 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Sherif Vs Zidansek Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
